PWLE Voices – Issue 5

PWLE Voices Newsletter — your voice, your community, better together.
September Is Pain Awareness Month Fourth of six  ·  One community, many conditions.
Pain Awareness Month (4/6)  ·  Issue 5  ·  2026  ·  September 2026
What’s a PWLE? A Person With Lived Experience. The NIH’s November 2025 ENGAGE report describes people and communities partnering with researchers to shape the questions that get asked, the studies that get designed, and the findings that get shared. In these pages, it means you.
The September Series  ·  Pain Awareness Month
  1. Issue 2From Awareness to Partnership
  2. Issue 3Origins — with Penney Cowan
  3. Issue 4Awareness That Moves Research
  4. Issue 5Awareness Isn’t ActionYou are here
  5. Issue 6The Ecosystem of Observances
  6. Issue 7Carrying September Forward

Six issues this month, numbered straight on. Issue 1 came out in June; Issue 8 follows in the fall.

Pain Awareness Month

Every September, the pain community marks Pain Awareness Month — a month for making invisible pain visible. PWLE Voices is marking it with six issues across the month: one community, many conditions, better together.

This issue’s focus — Awareness Isn’t Action. A month of ribbons does not pay an advisor or protect anyone’s benefits. This issue is about what comes after being seen: a researcher who lives with pain and still insists on patient partners, a woman who watched research priorities get set from inside the agency that funds them, what to ask for when a project says there is no budget, and a federal comment window that closes on October 26.

September is also Rheumatic Disease Awareness Month, launched by the American College of Rheumatology in 2016 to cover the hundred-plus conditions under the rheumatic umbrella — many of which bring chronic pain with them.

Featured This Issue
Ryan Wexler, a naturopathic physician and NIH HEAL K12 scholar, in a head-and-shoulders portrait.
Ryan Wexler, ND

A Researcher With Lived Experience

Because They Breathe

Ryan Wexler studies pain and has lived with it since he was thirteen. Ask him whether that lets a study team skip having people with lived experience at the table, and he will tell you it does not.

Thirteen minutes into our first conversation, Ryan Wexler mentioned his back almost in passing. He is twenty-nine, an NIH HEAL K12 scholar, and a naturopathic physician who studies the low back pain he has lived with through multiple surgeries. In this issue he answers the argument that a researcher with lived experience makes patient partners unnecessary — and offers the most practical advice either of us has heard on how a first meeting should actually go.

→ Read the full story

Stay Connected
Laura Wandner in a head-and-shoulders portrait.
Laura Wandner

Meet a Fellow PWLE

Getting to Know Laura Wandner

She lived with chronic pain while working inside the agency that funds pain research. What she saw from that side of the table — and what she wants this community to know about the doors in it.

Laura Wandner has seen pain research from more sides of the table than almost anyone — from patient care at the VA and Walter Reed to the Branch Chief’s desk at NIH’s Office of Pain Policy and Planning — all while living with chronic pain since her teens. She talks about how research priorities really get set, why tokenism is usually a training problem rather than a character problem, and what one committee member’s careful read did to a study budget. For anyone who assumes the NIH is a fortress with no door in it, she has a map.

→ Read the full story

Stay Empowered

Tools & Resources

“There’s No Budget”: What to Ask for Instead

When a project cannot pay you, that does not mean your time is free. What to ask for instead — and how to make sure the next round has a line for it.

Sometimes there really is no money. A grassroots project with no grant behind it. A planning group meeting months before the funding lands. The question is not whether to be offended — it is what to ask for instead, so that “no cash” never quietly becomes “no cost.” This piece lists what a project can usually cover even when it cannot pay a fee, from travel and connectivity to care costs and accessibility, and it ends with the ask that matters most: a line in next year’s budget.

→ Read the full guide

Worth a Listen  ·  Installment Two  ·  A continuing article

Three Shows, and What It Takes to Keep One On

The podcasts about engagement itself. Staying on the air turns out to be its own engagement problem.

Last time the three shows made a clean ladder: guest, producer, host. This time the ladder does not hold. The shows about engagement itself — asPERusual, The Bridge: Your Health Your Voice, and the Patient Partner Innovation Community Podcast — are each doing the work and each showing the strain of it. One is on a break its host announced and has not come back from. One has not posted in more than a year. The third is kept on by a university program with pharmaceutical sponsors. All three are free, and this time two of them carry transcripts. That is the finding, and it is worth hearing before you go looking for a room where your time will be paid for.

A continuing article. Worth a Listen returns every other issue — next in Issue 7, on the shows built around a single diagnosis.

→ Read the full installment

Stay Informed

Research Update

The One They Started With

NIH accepted every ENGAGE recommendation in December. The first one it built a public process around was telling participants what the study found. The draft policy landed in August, and comments close October 26.

NIH accepted the ENGAGE recommendations in December 2025 and said it would begin implementing in 2026. Nine months on, one recommendation has a published timeline, a named office running it, and now a draft policy with a deadline on it — the one about telling participants what the study found. NIH asked before it drafted, then drafted and asked again. Responses are due October 26, and three of the questions are addressed to participants rather than researchers.

→ Read the full story

Stay Engaged

Open Calls

Where to Put Your Hand Up

Three places your experience is being asked for right now. One of them has a deadline, and it is the one that costs you the least.

This issue is called Awareness Isn’t Action, so here is where awareness has somewhere to go. NIH published its draft policy on telling participants what a study found on August 27, and comments close October 26 — three of its questions are addressed to participants rather than researchers, a paragraph counts, and you may answer anonymously. Alongside it: PCORI’s merit reviewer applications, open year-round, and the advisory panel window that opens in November. Each listed with what it actually asks of you.

→ Read the full story

Every Piece in This Issue  ·  Issue 5, Awareness Isn’t Action

Featured — Because They Breathe
chronicpainla.com/because-they-breathe

Meet a Fellow PWLE — Getting to Know Laura Wandner
chronicpainla.com/getting-to-know-laura-wandner

Tools & Resources — “There’s No Budget”: What to Ask for Instead
chronicpainla.com/theres-no-budget

Worth a Listen — Three Shows, and What It Takes to Keep One On
chronicpainla.com/worth-a-listen-installment-two

Research Update — The One They Started With
chronicpainla.com/the-one-they-started-with

Open Calls — Where to Put Your Hand Up
chronicpainla.com/where-to-put-your-hand-up

How to Engage

Share your story or your reaction. Reach the editor at editorpwlevoices@gmail.com. We read every message.

Subscribe. Email editorpwlevoices@gmail.com with “Subscribe” in the subject line. Every issue also stays free to read at chronicpainla.com — no account, no paywall, no advertising.

Tell us we got something wrong. If a date has moved, a link has died, or a fact does not hold up, write to us. We would rather print a correction than leave an error standing.

Suggest a featured PWLE. Know an advocate whose story belongs in a future issue? Tell us.

Editorial Note Editor: Tom Norris  •  Contributors this issue: Ryan Wexler, Laura Wandner  •  Issue 5, September 2026

Featured pieces and contributor pieces are reviewed and approved by the named contributors before publication — and every contributor is offered the whole issue to edit, not just their own piece. Final editorial responsibility rests with the editor. The editor serves on the advisory committee of an NIH HEAL K12 program of which Ryan Wexler is a scholar; that overlap is disclosed at the top of his profile. The Stay Engaged listings carry a note naming the editor’s paid and unpaid roles at PCORI.
How This Newsletter Is Made PWLE Voices is written and edited by people in our community. For this issue, we also used two AI assistants — ChatGPT (OpenAI) and Claude (Anthropic) — in a limited, supporting role: copy editing and formatting, checking the layout, and helping research and verify background facts. AI did not write the stories, decide what any of them mean, or replace anyone’s voice. Because AI tools can state things confidently and still be wrong, a person checked any facts these tools helped surface against reliable sources — the responsibility for accuracy is ours, not the software’s. Every contributor is offered the whole issue before it publishes — not only their own piece — and is invited to edit it, not merely to approve it. The words are theirs. If they want something changed, it changes. We also want to be honest about the trade-offs. Running these tools uses real electricity and water, and there are social concerns too — the labor behind building them, data privacy, and uneven access. We try to use AI sparingly, only where it genuinely helps. To learn more, see the U.S. Government Accountability Office overview Artificial Intelligence: Generative AI’s Environmental and Human Effects (gao.gov, GAO-25-107172). Questions or thoughts about how we use these tools? Write to us at editorpwlevoices@gmail.com. We’ll keep refining this as the technology — and our community’s thinking — evolves.